Praesent cursus molestie libero, eget facilisis lorem tincidunt quis.
Morbi odio nulla, pellentesque aliquam tincidunt at, sodales quis dui.

Nunc vehicula mi ut nulla

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec gravida suscipit justo vel tempus. Nunc vehicula mi ut nulla tincidunt pulvinar. Sed quis erat non velit cursus cursus. Maecenas faucibus leo eget urna tristique faucibus. Suspendisse id metus laoreet, luctus est at, rutrum lorem. Sed at fringilla dolor. Sed sapien lectus, mollis sed iaculis eu, lacinia et nulla. Cras ac turpis fermentum ligula convallis convallis. Nullam faucibus convallis viverra. In eu nunc et dui tincidunt ultricies in id diam. Pellentesque sagittis interdum nunc sed fermentum. Donec velit lacus, fringilla et tincidunt eu, convallis nec justo. Etiam facilisis eu tortor vitae tempus. Donec a felis vitae dolor sollicitudin imperdiet eget in elit. Aenean at leo et risus commodo finibus sed id metus. Sed molestie tortor eu tellus condimentum, a porta quam tempor. Sed commodo placerat enim sit amet congue. Integer arcu arcu, euismod id urna at, tincidunt tempor ipsum. Fusce vitae magna metus. Sed sollicitudin aliquam metus, id volutpat magna tincidunt non. Vestibulum hendrerit id arcu et congue.

Case study

Senior debt plus
equity/mezzanine funding

Our client was looking to purchase a site in Milton Keynes for £10m which had consent for 100 plus residential units. They were very active developers and had six other sites under construction, which had caused a drain on their cash resources and the equity that they could inject into this transaction.

Funding requirement: the development appraisal set out total costs of £17m against a GDV of £26m. We were instructed to source the full costs of the project on the most favourable terms for the client without them having to inject any significant cash into the costs.

Facility provided: we negotiated a structured finance deal with a senior debt lender providing £13m and an equity provider funding the balance of the £17m costs. The senior debt had standard pricing terms and the equity partner agreed a fixed coupon for their funds of 20% rather than a profit share as this was the client’s preference.

Case study


The client in this case had an existing portfolio of 23 residential properties worth around £8m, but each was mortgaged to a separate buy-to-let lender.

Funding requirement: the client wanted to simplify their financing arrangements by having one lender across the whole portfolio plus they wanted to capital raise to allow them to purchase further investment properties.

Facility provided: we were able to offer a range of possible solutions from 60% LTV up to 75% LTV, but the client decided that a 65% facility was the best mix of gearing and pricing as we were able to secure this at a rate of circa 3% and with a 1% lender fee.

Case study

unsuitable property

An existing client was an active buy-to-let investor, but had identified a property with a great deal of potential, overlooking the fact that it did not have a usable kitchen or bathroom.

Funding Requirement: the client wanted a mortgage that would allow them to purchase the property, to put in a new kitchen and bathroom and keep the property as a long-term investment.

Facility Provided: we organised a facility that covered 70% of the purchase price for three months to allow the work to be completed and then the facility was switched to a long-term product at lower interest rates with the same lender to ensure that the client did not have to pay any additional fees.

Development Finance

Investment Finance

Short Term Finance